Hello Dear Reader

- Why????
Ok before I get into this Friday rant, I would like to offer a big Thank you to Ben for his post yesterday it is good to have him on board and I hope you will enjoy reading his additions as much as I do.
Now on to the Rant and I am going to ask if someone can please explain to me what the problem is with SOME (and I stress some) members of the BP Scouts on EScouts.
It seem like whenever a post goes up saying “we are having this issue” they comment saying “that is the problem with the TSA that is why I left.” The most recent one I saw was complaining about the paid staff at Gillwell park. I felt like saying “you do realise that no-one knows who the hell you are and all those paid staff are allowing you and your organisation to ride on our coattails” You think that is an unfair statement, maybe but you ask Mr/Mrs person in the street who the BP Scouts they will probably mention “Gilwell Park, Jamboree, Bear Grylls” all those things that the TSA have put into the media via their hard-working staff.
The second point that bugs me is, they say they Scout in accordance with BP’s traditions Ok but then answer these questions why do you have Beavers? and why do you accept girls? That is not how BP did it (a comment I have heard them used when talking about the our Scouting Programme.)
The BPSA is 40 years old and was created following the 1966 Advanced Party Report which looked to modernise the old Boy Scout Association and create the Scout Association. Although the Report was adopted by The Scout Association, it was not welcomed by all members and a rival report, “The Black Report”, was produced in 1970 by “The Scout Action Group”. This provided some alternative proposals for the development of the Movement and asked for Groups that wished to continue to follow Baden-Powell’s original scheme to be allowed to do so. This content of this Report was not accepted by The Scout Association, resulting in a split developing in the Movement and the formation of the Baden-Powell Scouts’ Association. Their membership in the UK, is very difficult to establish as their annual report does not seem to be published on their website, from what I have found they have about 40 groups in the UK.
So it seems to me that in 1970 some people decided they did not like the changes that came out of the advanced party report and decided to go it alone, so disassociated themselves from the Scout Association and set up on their own and now call themselves great and pick holes at anything the Scout Association does to look and move forward.
It would be like Chelsea saying hmm we don’t like the rules in the premier league so we are going to create a league with just us in it and then we can have as many overseas players we like in it and it is better that yours because we say so.
All that being said I am still a little fuzzy – so the BPSA members tell us we are not Scouting and not doing it the way BP did but…. if we really were doing something wrong I think the 500,000 young members would have looked else where would that not have??
A final thought – Do you know why Robert Baden Powell called it a Scout Movement? – He did so because it was not to be a stationary organisation but one that continued to move forward with the times.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Scouts take lead from Dragons’ Den, Apprentice with entrepreneur badge (telegraph.co.uk)
- Book Review: The Scouting Party: The Making of the Boy Scouts of America by David C. Scott and Brendan Murphy (seattlepi.com)
TTFN
Kiff
©ChrisMeadows2012


Hello Dear Reader![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_b.png?x-id=897baaf2-044a-411a-ad09-cb5f19bada58)